Published Decisions

Deputy Sheriff Had To Be Reinstated to Paid Status Once Disability Retirement Denied

Robin L. HANNA, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT et al.,
Defendants and Appellants.

No. B150425. | Sept. 17, 2002.

» Click Here For Full Case «

Civil Service Commission Does Not Have Jurisdiction Over FFDE

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SOCIAL SERVICES et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,
v.
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY,
Defendant; Linda Hoa,
Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

B282614 | Filed 5/15/2019

» Click Here For Full Case «

Anomalous Decision Unique to its Own Peculiar Facts re Commission Jurisdiction

Monique HUDSON, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES,
Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department,
Leroy Baca,
and Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association,
Defendants and Respondents.
Los Angeles County Super. Ct.

B247593, B248983 | Filed 11/14/2014

» Click Here For Full Case «

Licensee Must Be Acting In the Capacity of a Contractor Before the License Bond Can Be Subjected to Liability

Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division 1, California.
Gail BROWN, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
SURETY COMPANY OF THE PACIFIC, Defendant and Appellant.
Civ. 22954.

» Click Here For Full Case «

Wilful Violation Must Be Proved When Non Homeowner Claimant Seeks Bond Recovery

Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division 1, California.
NELSON SUPPLY COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
SURETY COMPANY OF THE PACIFIC, Defendant and Appellant.
D001012.
Civ. 31225.

» Click Here For Full Case «

Non-Homeowners Limited on Right to Recovery on Bond

Court of Appeal, First District, Division 3, California.
ALL BAY MILL & LUMBER CO., INC., Plaintiff, Cross-defendant, and Appellant,
v.
SURETY COMPANY OF THE PACIFIC, Defendant, Cross-complainant, and Respondent.
No. A041581.

» Click Here For Full Case «

Contractors License Law Not Applicable Unless Acting in the Capacity of a Contractor

Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division 1, California.
Gail BROWN, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
SURETY COMPANY OF THE PACIFIC, Defendant and Appellant.
Civ. 22954.

» Click Here For Full Case «

Indemnity Agreement is Found Not to be Ambiguous

Court of Appeal, Fourth District,
California.
CITY OF CHINO, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
Amy JACKSON, Defendant, Cross-defendant and Appellant;
Developer’s Insurance Company, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent.
No. E028198.

» Click Here For Full Case «

Negligent Preparation of Preliminary Title Report Is Not Actionable.

Southland Title Corp. v. Superior Court (Nye),
231 Cal. App. 3d 530, 282 Cal. Rptr 425 (1991)
Preliminary title policy affords limited protection.

» Click Here For Full Case «