HAUSMAN & SOSA
Unpublished Decisions
NOTE: UNPUBLISHED DECISIONS MAY NOT BE CITED PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT (see California Rules of Court, Rule 976 & 977). THE REASONING OF THESE CASES MAY BE OF INTEREST.
Discipline of Probation Officer Upheld
Salvador SALAS,
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION,
Defendant and Respondent,
County of Los Angeles Probation Department,
Real Party in Interest.
B280104 | Filed 10/17/2018
» Click Here for Full Case «
Court Finds No POBRA Violation
Roderick MARKS,
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES,
Defendant; Los Angeles County Probation Department,
Real Party in Interest and Respondent.
B239687 | Filed August 20, 2013
» Click Here for Full Case «
DCFS Employee’s Appeal of Suspension Properly Dismissed After Retirement
Diane B. WEISSBURG,
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, et al.,
Defendants and Respondents.
No. B225400. | (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BS123989). | April 22, 2011.
» Click Here for Full Case «
Jury Defense Verdict in Favor of Employer Upheld and Affirmed
Alice POWELL,
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES,
Defendants and Respondents.
B279151 | Filed 5/9/2019
» Click Here for Full Case «
Interpretation of Comprehensive Settlement Agreement Decided in Favor of County
Gail V. ANDERSON,
Jr.,
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES,
Defendants and Respondents.
B279304 | Filed 07/02/2018
» Click Here for Full Case «
Jury Verdict Finding Employee was Accommodated Upheld
Marie BROWN,
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,
Defendants and Respondents.
B259310 | Filed April 21, 2016
» Click Here for Full Case «
Discharge of Deputy Upheld for Profound Lack of Judgment
Judith DIAZ,
Plaintiff and Appellant, v.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION,
Defendant and Respondent; County of Los Angeles,
Real Party in Interest and Respondent.
B282451 | Filed 4/4/2019
» Click Here For Full Case «
No Pretext Shown in Constitutional Claim of Failure to Promote
Raul Field ESCANDON,
Plaintiff and Appellant, v.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY; Department of Public Works,
Department of Human Resources; William T. Fujioka,
Chief Executive Officer,
Defendants–Appellees.
No. 12–56700. | Submitted Aug. 12, 2014.* | Filed Aug. 15, 2014.
» Click Here For Full Case «
State Court Judgment in Favor of Employer Bars Subsequent Federal Civil Rights Claim
Carla CARR,
an individual,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF AUDITOR-CONTROLLER,
a local public entity; Does,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-56553 | Submitted March 6, 2018* Pasadena, California | Filed March 12, 2018
» Click Here For Full Case «
County’s Changes to Evaluation System was Not an Unfair Labor Practice
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et
al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v.
EMPLOYEE RELATIONS COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant;
Association of Deputy District Attorneys,
Real Party in Interest and Appellant.
No. B244307.
Filed January 12, 2015 APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County,
Ann I. Jones, Judge.
Affirmed.(Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BS132903)
» Click Here For Full Case «
Homeowners’ Attempt to Establish a Continuing Breach Either for Failure to Repair or Continuing fraudulent Concealment Causing Claims to Spill into Effective Dates of Surety’s Contractor’s License Bond Rebuffed by Court.
JUAN C. VIGIL et al.,
Cross-Complainants and Appellants,
v.
WESCO INSURANCE COMPANY,
Cross-Defendant and Respondent.
No. D066712.
(Super. Ct. No. 37-2012-00058529-CU-BC-NC)
» Click Here for Full Case «
90 Limitations Period Under 1094.6 Does Not Apply to Administrative Decision Finding Discrimination
Internal Services Department of the County of Los Angeles,
Appellant,
v.
Civil Service Commission of the County of Los Angeles,
Respondent;
Chery Ivory
No. B139976.
(Super.Ct.No. BS060327).
» Click Here for Full Case «
Default Judgments Cannot Exceed the Amount Stated in Either the Prayer or the Body of the Complaint
Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division 2, California.
DEVELOPERS SURETY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, Cross-complainant and Respondent,
v.
William Alvin LEE, Cross-defendant and Appellant.
No. E044196.
(Super.Ct.No. RCV079568).
» Click Here for Full Case «
Insufficient Proof of Racial Discrimination; Civil Service Commissions Findings are Overturned
Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 4, California.
INTERNAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT OF the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiff and
Respondent,
v.
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant,
Cheryl Ivory, Objector and Appellant.
No. B165032.
(Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BS060327).
» Click Here for Full Case «
County Recovers Costs on Writ Case
Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 4, California.
Steven KALSKI, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES et al., Defendants and Respondents.
No. B153830.
(Super.Ct.No. BC113774).
» Click Here for Full Case «
Agency Cannot Use Summary Judgment Procedure Unless Rules Allow
Court of Appeal, Second District,
Division 8.
Steven KALSKI, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
Michael D. ANTONOVICH, as Supervisor, etc., et al., Defendants and Appellants;
California Association of Professional Employees, Defendant and Respondent.
No. B208252.
(Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BS105860).
» Click Here for Full Case «
Court Upholds Use of Prior Criminal Testimony in Discharge Proceedings
Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 3, California.
Clarence JOHNS, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, Defendant and Respondent.
No. B180909.
(Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BS087896).
» Click Here for Full Case «
Court Upholds Findings for Discipline of Fire Fighter and Rejects Claim that Due Process Rights Were Violated
Murrieta v. Civil Service Commission
Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.3d, 2008 WL 5235164
Cal.App. 2 Dist.,2008.
December 17, 2008
Plaintiff Given Opportunity to Amend Complaint to Attempt to Show Wrongful Termination
Haggins v. County of Los Angeles
Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.3d, 2007 WL 1978889 Cal.App. 2 Dist.,2007.
July 10, 2007
Ana Flores Claimed She Experienced Unlawful Sexual Harassment and Retaliation by the County – Appellate Court Ruled in Favor of the County
Ana FLORES, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES PROBATION
DEPARTMENT, Defendant and Appellant.
B287382 | Filed 12/13/2019
>> Click Here for Full Case <<
Appellate Court Affirmed the Trial Court’s Judgment Ordering ERCOM to Set Aside Its Order Prohibiting the DAO from Implementing the New System – The Trial Court had Jurisdiction
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,
v.
EMPLOYEE RELATIONS COMMISSION OF
THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant;
Association of Deputy District Attorneys,
Real Party in Interest and Appellant.
B244307 | Filed January 12, 2015
>> Click Here for Full Case<<
Petitioner Seeks a Writ of Mandate Directing the Superior Court to Vacate Its Order (Code of Civil Procedure 170.6 CCP) – Appellate Court Grant’s the Writ
Subramaniam BALASUBRAMANIAN, Petitioner,
v.
Los Angeles County SUPERIOR COURT, Respondent;
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
et al., Real Parties in Interest.
No. B151353 | (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC158506)
Dec. 12, 2001
Plaintiff Alleges that the County Violated the POBRA
by Failing to Disclose a Memoranda that White’s Supervisors had Prepared and Submitted to Their Superiors Regarding Their Concerns about White’s Psychological Condition and Fitness for Duty. The County Challenges Both Orders on Appeal – Appellate Court Affirms
Susan WHITE, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
et al., Defendants and Appellants.
B254503 | Filed May 12, 2016
>> Click Here for Full Case <<
Defendants Failed to Make a Prima Facie
Showing that the Plaintiffs’ Causes of Action Arose Out of
Activity Protected by the Anti–SLAPP Statute
ASSOCIATION FOR LOS ANGELES DEPUTY
SHERIFFS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et
al., Defendants and Respondents
B260584 | Filed 10/17/2016
» Click Here for Full Case «
Plaintiff Appeals, Contending the Trial Court
Erred in Sustaining the Demurrer and by Refusing to Allow Her
Leave to Amend – Appellate Court Affirms the Order of Dismissal (Plaintiff Cannot State a Claim for Whistle Blower Liability Against the County)
Cheryl WILLIAMS, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES,
Defendant and Respondent.
No. B173162 |(Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC294605) | June 3, 2005
» Click Here for Full Case «
Dr. Singer Contends He
was Denied a Fair Administrative Hearing as a Result of Laches
and Insufficient Notice – Appellate Court Rejects Dr. Singer’s Contentions and
Affirm
Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 4, California.
Jay SINGER, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF
MENTAL HEALTH, Defendant and Respondent.
B243486 | Filed April 3, 2014
Appellate Court Affirms the Trial Court’s Order, because They
Concluded that Section 6.20.100 does not Permit a Trial Court to
Award a Wrongfully Terminated Employee a Gross-Up Payment
Maricela GUILLERMO, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF
HEALTH SERVICES, Defendant and Respondent.
B296925 | Filed 12/1/2020
Appellate Court Affirms, Finding that the Majority of Plaintiff’s Claims were
Never Raised Either before the Commission or in the Trial Court,
or were Inadequately Addressed on Appeal, and therefore cannot be Reviewed by this
Court
Carlos M. ROSARIO, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF
HEALTH SERVICES, Defendant and Respondent.
B239182 | Filed April 12, 2013
Appellate Court Affirmed Judgment for Dismissal – Found that the County could Properly Raise as a Defense to Plaintiff’s Lawsuit his Failure to File a Claim
Carlos M. ROSARIO, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES,
Defendant and Respondent.
No. B210349 | (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC377581) | Sept. 30, 2009